Bible Project Essay Example for Free

Bible Project Essay 1. The difference between self-interest and selfishness could perhaps be best described as the difference between a desire to be monetarily successful and voracious greed for every last penny. Self-interest is when someone wants more for themselves, regardless of what it is they desire. A person could want more money, a bigger television, faster computers, or just better health with six pack abs. Selfishness is much more like when someone is willing to do anything, including hurt others, to get what they want. The difference is subtle, but it is there. Now, in terms of a competitive market economy, selfishness will lead to eventual collapse, while self-interest could potentially increase the general good, even if inadvertently. Selfishness is corrupting and businesses that are so will seek to draw as much profit out of their employees and customers as is possible, heedless of economic survival. 2. In my reading so far, I do believe the text will discuss normative economics. On page 178, the text has a section discussing unemployment. This set-aside section discusses the problem of unemployment, and the question of whether or not unemployment would exist at all if the market were functioning perfectly. This theory is completely untestable as the market will never function perfectly, and/or unemployment will never cease to exist to test whether the market is functioning perfectly at the time. 3. Adam Smith believes that people at heart desire others to approve of them, so their selfish attributes are restrained just enough that people don’t think less of them for it. 4. In keeping with God’s plan, a person can take part of the democratic capitalistic society, but without becoming corrupted by it. A person keeping true to faith and prayer will be more capable of sympathy, of doing more for the good will, and of creating an abundance of good will (worth far more than its weight in gold). Keeping God in one’s heart will keep selfishness out. - 1. Reparation for historical acts is a very difficult issue to discuss, let alone decide upon. Honestly, while I feel for the countries and peoples that have suffered throughout history for the malicious and greedy acts of others, I think that offering reparations of any sort to anyone would do little more knock over the first domino in a very long series of requests for reparations. It becomes a question of when to draw the line, and in that it would be unfair to say that this person doesn’t deserve reparations over that one. If we are going to discuss the sins of one, we must admit to the same sinful traits of the other. The same greed that motivated the historical acts is likely to affect those coming forward to ask for reparation. Rather than looking back, we should look forward and consider how best to aid these same affected peoples and countries in the future. 2. Benefits: 1) There are plenty of jobs to go around. 2) The quality of life improves, both through the proliferation of jobs and innovation in trade markets, whether agricultural or technological or other change. 3) People generally live longer and debatably healthier lives, through medical innovations, having more money to spend on healthcare, and better quality goods in their lives. 4) People and companies and churches and other charitable organizations are more capable of doing good in the world. More money does equal more charitable giving. 5) People can grow closer through technological improvements (the phone, computer, internet) and through changes in transportation (one day there will hopefully be some form of instantaneous transportation, making it possible to be closer to friends and family who are very far away). Costs: 1) As people come closer together, they are also driven apart. Currently technology binds people together, but also isolates people in different rooms, on different computers, and practically living on different planets. The internet is the one place where you can be with millions of people and still completely alone. 2) Environmental damage is a serious issue, as we are entrusted with the stewardship of the planet and economic growth usually means that some company somewhere is taking shortcuts and likely making profit to the detriment of everyone. 3) As much as there are jobs created, there are also many jobs lost. For example, the growing crop of future employees will be far more computer capable and technologically innovative and skilled then the current set of employees. No doubt in the future companies will fire their current older and less qualified employees to hire someone younger, more skilled, but willing to take less pay. 4) When it comes to the now plentiful state of food in most countries, there is a steep price to pay all on its own. Economic growth is usually best defined by a growth in profits, and where a lot of food companies see a growth in profits is by spreading the meal as thinly and cheaply as possible. Food has become an amalgamation of processed chemicals with a little dash of real nutrition thrown in, both to suit the profit margin and to make meals easier for people to prepare in their increasingly busy lives. This is in stark contrast to a time when people used to buy food in its whole, natural state and cook it for themselves. Health is simultaneously going up and going down. People are living longer, but the quality of their health is one that is always up for discussion. 5) Values are sometimes lost in a growing economy. As others prosper, even more see their success and covet it for themselves, losing sight of the real point of economic growth – making lives better so that everyone can better partake in their faith and therefore please God. 3. The United States can maintain its trade deficit because of an inflow of capital. Foreign markets bring in money, making it possible for the country to accept more imports. 4. In the times past, have the winners shared? Not really. But today, I would say I think that nobody is really losing as long as the trade system is working. In most cases both sides are going to benefit in some manner, although there will undoubtedly be one side gaining more than the other. But if the system isn’t resulting in the complete destruction or abuse of a people or culture as it has in the past, there isn’t a real â€Å"loser.†

Confederate States Of America Essay -- essays papers

Confederate States Of America Confederate States of America, the name adopted by the federation of 11 slave holding Southern states of the United States that seceded from the Union and were arrayed against the national government during the American Civil War. Immediately after confirmation of the election of Abraham Lincoln as president, the legislature of South Carolina convened. In a unanimous vote on December 20, 1860, the state seceded from the Union. During the next two months ordinances of secession were adopted by the states of Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas. President James Buchanan, in the last days of his administration, declared that the federal government would not forcibly prevent the secessions. In February 1861, the seceding states sent representatives to a convention in Montgomery, Alabama. The convention, presided over by Howell Cobb of Georgia, adopted a provisional constitution and chose Jefferson Davis of Mississippi as provisional president and Alexander Hamilton Stephens of Georgia as provisional vice president. The convention, on March 11, 1861, unanimously ratified a permanent constitution. The constitution, which closely resembled the federal Constitution, prohibited the African slave trade but allowed interstate commerce in slaves. Jefferson Davis (1808-89), first and only president of the Confederate States of America (1861-65). Davis was born on June 3, 1808, in Christian (now Todd) County, Kentucky, and educated at Transylvania University, Lexington, Kentucky, and at the U.S. Military Academy. After his graduation in 1828, he saw frontier service until ill health forced his resignation from the army in 1835. He was a planter in Mississippi from 1835 to 1845, when he was elected to the U.S. Congress. In 1846 he resigned his seat in order to serve in the Mexican War and fought at Monterrey and Buena Vista, where he was wounded. He was U.S. senator from Mississippi from 1847 to 1851, secretary of war in the cabinet of President Franklin Pierce from 1853 to 1857, and again U.S. senator from 1857 to 1861. As a senator he often stated his support of slavery and of states' rights, and as a cabinet member he influenced Pierce to sign the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which favored the South and increased the bitterness of the struggle over slavery. In his second term as senator he became t... ...llion; those of the North at $331 million. It was thus obvious that the South was dependent on Europe and on the North for material goods. The lack of resources forced the Confederacy to levy war taxes and borrow heavily on future cotton crops. An inflationary period in 1863 and later government actions almost destroyed the Confederate credit. In addition the South was hampered by the lack of powder mills and of suitable iron works; only one plant, the Tredegar Iron Works in Richmond, was equipped to turn out large field guns. The railroad system was inadequately developed and equipped, and although the South made desperate attempts to maintain itself in a battle against overwhelming odds, the struggles left it financially and industrially ruined at the close of the Civil War. The process of restoring the Confederacy to the Union was called Reconstruction . The U.S. Supreme Court, in 1869, in the case of Texas v. White, declared secession unconstitutional. Bibliography 1. Compton’s Online Encyclopedia 2. America Is, Merrill Publishing Company and Bell and Howell Company, 1987, Columbus, Ohio 3. The American Nation, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994

I got a D for this TOK Essay Essay

4. The traditional TOK diagram indicates four ways of knowing. Propose the inclusion of a fifth way of knowing selected from intuition, memory or imagination, and explore the knowledge issues it may raise in two areas of knowledge. Word count: 1207 Memory is a tool people use to process things they come to learn about the world. In psychology memory is described by the term cognitive processes which include perception, thinking, problem solving, memory, language and attention. Cognition is ones mental perception of the world like images, words and concepts. Memory is not an exact copy of experiences but an outline. What people actually remember and what they have been told by someone else, is mixed so the thing people remember and thinks is the truth is a lie. This is called false memory and the brain would make an illusion or use imagination to twist the truth around. In this connection where people can manipulate memory questions may arise about the trustworthiness in a witness testimony. Also when people can manipulate memory how reliable is memory as a way of knowing. If a person witnessed a robbery and testified to the police about what they saw, you would not believe that a person would lie but if the policeman were to ask the wrong question people would subconsciously lie about what they saw. For example if a police man could ask, what colour shirt was he wearing? The witness would thing about the colour of the shirt but if instead he asked, what colour shirt was he wearing? Green? Blue? The witness might mention one of those colours the police man mentioned. So the witness could accidently give a false testimony because the policeman’s question was not neutral hence, the witness got false memory. This would be a connection to history as a area of knowing, history books consist of memories written down. Some history books are of primary memory, written by people who have experienced a historical aspect and secondary memory, written by people who have been told by another person who had experienced a historical aspect. Since memory is not always remembered correct history books can be wrong. Memory is one of the most important ways by which our histories animate our current actions and experiences. Memory seems to be a source of knowledge. We remember experiences and events which are not happening now, so memory differs from perception. We remember events which really happened, so memory is unlike pure imagination. Yet, in practice, there can be close interactions between remembering, perceiving, and imagining. Another area of knowing were memory is used is the arts. Actors, musicians and dancers use memory to remember words, notes and choreography. How they do this is by using motion, a required motion on stage, so the moves help the brain to recall stored information. Communication, reading lines out laud, even in early stages and try to visualise an audience you have to communicate to. Internalization, make the lines personal, to become the character, dancer or musician. In the way of knowing memory plays a big role in inductive reasoning and you could ask, to what extent is reason based on previous memory experience? We jump to conclusions in inductive reasoning as the results of our memory since memory is the key to remember past events, for example a person has only seen a red rose all his life so therefore all roses must be red but that is not true because there are many different coloured roses and this is called the problem of induction. If something has happen often in the past, there is a good chance it will do so again. The conclusions are drawn from limited evidence because we have no choice but to do so, most of the times this seems reasonable but sometimes not, we need to consider if the evidence supports a conclusion and when it doesn’t. Also in deductive reasoning we use memory to make generalisations and to draw similarities between issues, objects and thought. In deductive reasoning we would use memory to know what is required of valid and a true argument. In language also a way of knowing, memory is used to remember and understand the †codes† ,â€Å"symbols† and sounds in order to learn and communicate the language that is being taught. If we weren’t able to remember the†codes†, â€Å"symbols† and sounds when learning a language, languages would be meaningless. Because all we would just have been taught would be forgotten right away. Sense perception, a way of knowing, can only be used if we can remember what we see, hear, feel, smell and taste. Without memory we wouldn’t be able to recall these senses and perceive them. The other way around sense perception is a big trigger of memory, if for example the smell of a horse triggers my memory to think of my childhood because I grew up on a farm with horses so I would connect those things together, the smell of horses = my childhood. The same if a heard a specific song in an important moment of my life then when I heard that song later on in life I would think of that moment. Big event makes people remember too for example 9/11, people can remember what they were doing and where they were at the moment they were told or saw it on the news. Emotion is one of the ways of knowing which most people would argue could do without memory since it acts on impulse. However emotions are based on past experiences like affection and hatred towards somebody due to past events. In the dictionary emotion is described as particular type of mental state similar to memory. People remember differently and they need to know what type of learner they are. Some people are visual learners and others are audio learners. Visual learners need to see things to understand them for example in chemistry a visual learner needs to see the atom to understand what it is. An audio learner would need to hear the things they need to learn out laud and would not be able to understand it if the person had to read things to learn. If we know which type of learner we are we can better learn and learn faster. Memory is an important skill to have because without it we would not be able to exist. We would not be able to remember what we like, were we live, who to trust or what is right and wrong. Memory is the essential thing that the ways of knowing are build and based. It links all the ways of knowing together because all the ways of knowing needs memory to work precisely. Memory would not necessarily be a fifth way of knowing since there are many  flaw to memory, but I think that it connects the ways of knowing and it is an important skill to have so we can learn and use the accepted ways of knowing. Memory could be the overall term of ways of knowing and the four ways of knowing could be under the memory category. Bibliography Books Crane, John and Hannibal, Jette, Psychology course companion, Oxford university press, 2009 Alchin, Nicholas, Hodder Murray, 2003 Internet pages http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/memory/ http://theater.about.com/od/careersintheater/a/actors-memory.htm http://www.ibsurvival.com/topic/13374-memory/ http://pottsiex5.wordpress.com/2012/02/22/tok-reflection-memory/

Comparing Modern And Traditional Poems - 1359 Words

Comparison of Modern and Traditional Poems Literature always reflects the reality in the contemporary world. There have been a number of poetic creations from remarkable writers who could skillfully fabricate works which echo the multidimensional aspects of the existing world. However, apart from considering a poem’s worth by linking to its social and cultural contexts, an independent analysis is quite possible. It is in this context that a deep textual analysis of the formal features of the poems becomes significant. A formal analysis can be done for any poem of any style, modern or traditional. The modern poems such as Theme for English B by Langston Hughes and â€Å"The Fish† by Elizabeth Bishop can be compared with traditional poems such as Shakespeare’s â€Å"My mistress eyes are nothing like the sun† and â€Å"Ode on Melancholy† by John Keats. Langston Hughes’ Theme for English B has been written in free verse having no form or meter. The poem is relevant in any study of historical criticisms on poetry for its in-depth analysis on the oppressive social condition. Being a member of the African American community, the poet has always been facing discrimination from all corners. To top it all, he has been struggle with searching for his own individual identity. Being in the midst of the white world, he finds it difficult to assert his individual values and principles. This hard situation is well depicted in the poem with adequate poetic devices. One of the major aspects of theShow MoreRelatedHow does The Love Song of J.Alfred Prufrock reflect T.S.Eliots concerns about the modern world?979 Words   |  4 Pagesabout the modern world? T.S.Eliots poem, The Love Song of J.Alfred Prufrock, is written in a modernist style. This becomes apparent from the very first stanza, when he describes a sunset. In Georgian poetry, a sunset is usually described in a beautiful sense, whereas Eliot has compared it to a patient etherised upon a table. The language Eliot has used is one of a scientific and sterile nature. He may be trying to raise questions as to what we perceive as beautiful in our modern world, as peopleRead MoreEssay on Modernism Brought Much Change into the World1074 Words   |  5 Pages​Modernism or modernist poetry refers to the time period where poems were written by various people between the 1890s and 1970s. Modernism poets have a lot of knowledge and their works reflect it. The Era of modernism brought on modern language as it referred to thought, practice or someone’s character. This brought on a lot of change in the world. The thought behind the thinking of modernist poets were that of indi vidualism. The modern movement came about as the result of the industrial revolutionRead More Compare Carol Ann Duffys Valentine to Andrew Marvells To His Coy1569 Words   |  7 PagesIn this assignment I will be comparing two love poems Carol Ann Duffys Valentine to Andrew Marvells To His Coy Mistress. The poem Valentine was written is the twentieth century and in it the speaker uses onion as a metaphor to show her love. The poem To His Coy Mistress was written in the seventeenth century and is about the poet trying to persuade his Mistress to sleep with him. Valentine by Carol Ann Duffy is very different to any other love poem as you would expect to readRead MoreUse Of Language Ruined Our Actual Language? By David Crystal936 Words   |  4 PagesCrystal uses two rhetorical strategies to prove his argument, one being humor to compare two types of poems that were sent through text message, the other using analogy to compare schooling, and texting, and the last his using analogy to compare abbreviations that are used today, were used in history. Crystal uses humor comparing traditional writing and modern writing. David Crystal compares two poems that, were sent into a T-Mobile poetry contest. The winner of the contest has a haiku format, whereRead MoreThe Glass As Half Full1552 Words   |  7 Pagesstructure at the time the poem was written was one dominated by heterosexual, misogynistic men, suggesting that Donne’s treatment of female homosexuality was geared towards the satiation of these heterosexual males’ desires, these men being his primary audience at the time. However, the significance of Donne’s poem must be explored on another level. In contrast to the view that the piece was meant to represent a male dominant society, an alternate view is that the poem originates from a place ofRead More The Cultural Conflict of Hugh Selwyn Mauberley Essay1180 Words   |  5 Pages      Ã‚   By imitating writing styles of ancient poets, Ezra Pound exhibited his attitude toward modern civilization, and his famous poem, Hugh Selwyn Mauberley, is the stereotype. In this poem, Pound revealed his disagreement with industrial society. The poem is an imitation of other old poetic styles, or epic style; however, it presents ironic meaning. To fully understand Pounds divergence from modern culture, the ways of presenting his position will be firstly explained. Next, the focus is on theRead MoreTechnology During The Twentieth Century1076 Words   |  5 Pagesto advance their cause. Five thousand women marched on Washington in order to gain media attention and support, and this coverage eventually led to the ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment (Belasco and Johnson 489). World War I saw the use of modern warfare including chemical weapons and airplanes, tanks, and the machine gun. This technology made war more horrible and more complex than previous wars. This was also the time of jazz music, the flapper, and full-length talking movies (498-499)Read MoreTechiniques Used in This Is Love and Leaving Prince Charming Behind by Karlo Mila870 Words   |  4 PagesParticular techniques are used in the poems: ‘Leaving Prince Charming Behind’ and ‘This is Love’ by Karlo Mila to challenge the views of what love actually means which is held by society. ‘Leaving Prince Charming Behind’ is about a girl that was in a relationship which appear perfect on the outside, with a partner that played the perfect role but did not feel comfortable in the relationship, while ‘This is Love’ is about a girl who had all these misconceptions of love and is guided by her partnerRead MoreThe Transformation of the Role of Women within Victorian Poetry1489 Words   |  6 Pagesundervalued by the men depicting them through their writing. Throughout this essay, I will demonstrate the differences between the way women were depicted in Victorian Poetry, by comparing and contrasting the work of Coventry Patmore’s â€Å"The Angel in the House† to Robert Browning’s â€Å"Porphyria’s Lover†, and George Meredith’s â€Å"Modern Love†, as a way to depict the transformative state that poetry has undergone. In Patmore’s â€Å"The Angel in the House† the woman is illustrated as a marginalized character, comparedRead MoreComparing the Poems City Jungle by Pie Corbett, London by William Blake and Londinium by Catatonia910 Words   |  4 PagesComparing the Poems City Jungle by Pie Corbett, London by William Blake and Londinium by Catatonia City Jungle by Pie Corbett, London by William Blake and Londinium by Catatonia are poems that share the same theme: cities and city life. They each have negative opinions of cities and similar themes and messages, that cities are unpleasant. The poems are however, vastly different in their style; City Jungle has a fun atmosphere, whereas Londinium and London have